A Chinese paleontologist lectures around the world saying that recent fossil finds — Phillip E. Johnson
Science…has become identified with a philosophy known as materialism or scientific — Phillip E. Johnson
Modernist discourse […] incorporates semantic devices – such as the labeling of theism — Phillip E. Johnson
The Intelligent Design movement starts with the recognition that “In the beginning — Phillip E. Johnson
Evolutionary biologists have been able to pretend to know how complex biological — Phillip E. Johnson
The monopoly of science in the realm of knowledge explains why evolutionary biologists do — Phillip E. Johnson
Truth as such is not a particularly important concept in naturalistic philosophy. — Phillip E. Johnson
To philosophical materialists God is no more than an idea in the human mind, and not a very important idea. — Phillip E. Johnson
The second advantage claimed for naturalism is that it is equivalent to rationality — Phillip E. Johnson
The restriction of religion to private life therefore does not necessarily threaten the — Phillip E. Johnson
The problem with allowing God a role in the history of life is not that science would cease — Phillip E. Johnson
The assumption that nature is all there is, and that nature has been governed by the — Phillip E. Johnson
Some theists in evolutionary science acquiesce to these tacit rules and retain a personal — Phillip E. Johnson
So one reason the science educators panic at the first sign of public rebellion is that they — Phillip E. Johnson
No doubt it is true that science cannot study God, but it hardly follows that God had to — Phillip E. Johnson
Most importantly, I agree that the truth of these matters should be determined by — Phillip E. Johnson
Modernism is typically defined as the condition that begins when people realize God — Phillip E. Johnson
In the most important sense a creationist is a person who believes in creation, and that includes — Phillip E. Johnson
In short, the proposition that God was in any way involved in our creation is effectively — Phillip E. Johnson
In short, it is not that evolutionary naturalists have been less brazen than the scientific — Phillip E. Johnson
First, darwinian theory tells us how a certain amount of diversity in life forms can — Phillip E. Johnson
Evolutionary naturalism takes the inherent limitations of science and turns them into a — Phillip E. Johnson
Darwinism is not merely a support for naturalistic philosophy: it is a product of naturalistic philosophy. — Phillip E. Johnson
Evolutionary biologists are not content merely to explain how variation occurs within limits — Phillip E. Johnson
Although I insist that God has always had the power to intervene directly in nature to — Phillip E. Johnson
All the most prominent darwinists proclaim naturalistic philosophy when they think it safe to do so. — Phillip E. Johnson
According to the scientific naturalist version of cosmic history, nature is a permanently — Phillip E. Johnson
A constitutional democracy is in serious trouble if its citizenry does not have a certain — Phillip E. Johnson